Immune checkpoint modulators in early clinical development for the treatment of type 1 diabetes.

INTRODUCTION: Despite the improvements of insulin therapy, people with type 1 diabetes (T1D) still suffer from a decreased quality of life and life expectancy. The search toward a cure for T1D is therefore still a scorching open field of research. AREAS COVERED: Tackling the immune checkpoint signaling pathways has gained importance in the field of cancer immunotherapy. The same pathways can be targeted in autoimmunity with an opposite principle: to dampen the exaggerated immune response. In this review, we report a comprehensive excursus on the cellular and molecular mechanisms that lead to loss of immunological tolerance, and recent evidence on the role of immune checkpoint molecules in the development of T1D and their potential application for the mitigation of autoimmune diabetes. EXPERT OPINION: Contrasting results about the efficacy of immune checkpoint modulators for T1D have been published, with very few molecules from preclinical studies eligible for use in humans. The heterogeneous and complex pathophysiology of T1D may explain the conflicting evidence. Designing clinical trials that acknowledge the pathophysiological and clinical complexity of T1D and that forecast the need of simultaneously tackling different disease pathways will be crucial to enhance the benefits which may be gained by such compounds.

Stress regulates Alzheimer's disease progression via selective enrichment of CD8+ T cells.

This study investigates stress's impact on Alzheimer's disease (AD) using male APP/PS1 transgenic mice. Negative stressors (chronic social defeat, restraint) and positive hedonia (environmental enrichment, EE) were applied. Stress worsens AD pathology, while EE slows progression. Brain RNA sequencing reveals interleukin-6 (IL-6) and IL-10 as key stress-related AD regulators. Flow cytometry shows that the CD8+/CD4+ T cell ratio shifts in response to stress exposure and EE. Stress exposure increases CD8+/CD4+ ratio, opposite to EE. Depletion and enrichment of CD8+ T cells both accelerate AD, indicating immune intervention's negative impact. Stress management and balanced immunity may aid AD therapy, highlighting novel potential treatment.

The need and benefit of immune monitoring to define patient and disease heterogeneity, mechanisms of therapeutic action and efficacy of intervention therapy for precision medicine in type 1 diabetes.

The current standard of care for type 1 diabetes patients is limited to treatment of the symptoms of the disease, insulin insufficiency and its complications, not its cause. Given the autoimmune nature of type 1 diabetes, immunology is critical to understand the mechanism of disease progression, patient and disease heterogeneity and therapeutic action. Immune monitoring offers the key to all this essential knowledge and is therefore indispensable, despite the challenges and costs associated. In this perspective, I attempt to make this case by providing evidence from the past to create a perspective for future trials and patient selection.

Tolerogenic dendritic cells pulsed with islet antigen induce long-term reduction in T-cell autoreactivity in type 1 diabetes patients.

Introduction: Restoration of immune tolerance may halt progression of autoimmune diseases. Tolerogenic dendritic cells (tolDC) inhibit antigen-specific proinflammatory T-cells, generate antigen-specific regulatory T-cells and promote IL-10 production in-vitro, providing an appealing immunotherapy to intervene in autoimmune disease progression. Methods: A placebo-controlled, dose escalation phase 1 clinical trial in nine adult patients with long-standing type 1 diabetes (T1D) demonstrated the safety and feasibility of two (prime-boost) vaccinations with tolDC pulsed with a proinsulin peptide. Immunoregulatory effects were monitored by antigen-specific T-cell assays and flow and mass cytometry. Results: The tolDC vaccine induced a profound and durable decline in pre-existing autoimmune responses to the vaccine peptide up to 3 years after therapy and temporary decline in CD4 and CD8+ T-cell responses to other islet autoantigens. While major leukocyte subsets remained stable, ICOS+CCR4+TIGIT+ Tregs and CD103+ tissue-resident and CCR6+ effector memory CD4+ T-cells increased in response to the first tolDC injection, the latter declining thereafter below baseline levels. Discussion: Our data identify immune correlates of mechanistic efficacy of intradermally injected tolDC reducing proinsulin autoimmunity in T1D.

From Disease and Patient Heterogeneity to Precision Medicine in Type 1 Diabetes.

Type 1 diabetes (T1D) remains a devastating disease that requires much effort to control. Life-long daily insulin injections or an insulin pump are required to avoid severe complications. With many factors contributing to disease onset, T1D is a complex disease to cure. In this review, the risk factors, pathophysiology and defect pathways are discussed. Results from (pre)clinical studies are highlighted that explore restoration of insulin production and reduction of autoimmunity. It has become clear that treatment responsiveness depends on certain pathophysiological or genetic characteristics that differ between patients. For instance, age at disease manifestation associated with efficacy of immune intervention therapies, such as depleting islet-specific effector T cells or memory B cells and increasing immune regulation. The new challenge is to determine in whom to apply which intervention strategy. Within patients with high rates of insulitis in early T1D onset, therapy depleting T cells or targeting B lymphocytes may have a benefit, whereas slow progressing T1D in adults may be better served with more sophisticated, precise and specific disease modifying therapies. Genetic barcoding and immune profiling may help determining from which new T1D endotypes patients suffer. Furthermore, progressed T1D needs replenishment of insulin production besides autoimmunity reversal, as too many beta cells are already lost or defect. Recurrent islet autoimmunity and allograft rejection or necrosis seem to be the most challenging obstacles. Since beta cells are highly immunogenic under stress, treatment might be more effective with stress reducing agents such as glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) analogs. Moreover, genetic editing by CRISPR-Cas9 allows to create hypoimmunogenic beta cells with modified human leukocyte antigen (HLA) expression that secrete immune regulating molecules. Given the differences in T1D between patients, stratification of endotypes in clinical trials seems essential for precision medicines and clinical decision making.

Immune Intervention in Sepsis.

Sepsis is a host immune disorder induced by infection. It can lead to multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS), which has high morbidity and mortality. There has been great progress in the clinical diagnosis and treatment of sepsis, such as improvements in pathogen detection technology, innovations regarding anti-infection drugs, and the development of organ function support. Abnormal immune responses triggered by pathogens, ranging from excessive inflammation to immunosuppression, are recognized to be an important cause of the high mortality rate. However, no drugs have been approved specifically for treating sepsis. Here, we review the recent research progress on immune responses in sepsis to provide a theoretical basis for the treatment of sepsis. Constructing and optimizing a dynamic immune system treatment regimen based on anti-infection treatment, fluid replacement, organ function support, and timely use of immunomodulatory interventions may improve the prognosis of sepsis patients.

Combined Etanercept, GAD-alum and vitamin D treatment: an open pilot trial to preserve beta cell function in recent onset type 1 diabetes.

AIM: We aimed to study the feasibility and tolerability of a combination therapy consisting of glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD-alum), Etanercept and vitamin D in children and adolescents with newly diagnosed with type 1 diabetes (T1D), and evaluate preservation of beta cell function. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Etanercept Diamyd Combination Regimen is an open-labelled multi-centre study pilot trial which enrolled 20 GAD antibodies positive T1D patients (7 girls and 13 boys), aged (mean ±SD): 12.4 ± 2.3 (8.3-16.1) years, with a diabetes duration of 81.4 ± 22.1 days. Baseline fasting C-peptide was 0.24 ± 0.1 (0.10-0.35) nmol/l. The patients received Day 1-450 Vitamin D (Calciferol) 2000 U/d per os, Etanercept sc Day 1-90 0.8 mg/kg once a week and GAD-alum sc injections (20 µg, Diamyd™) Day 30 and 60. They were followed for 30 months. RESULTS: No treatment related serious adverse events were observed. After 6 months 90-min stimulated C-peptide had improved in 8/20 patients and C-peptide area under the curve (AUC) after Mixed Meal Tolerance Test in 5 patients, but declined thereafter, while HbA1c and insulin requirement remained close to baseline. Administration of Etanercept did not reduce tumour necrosis factor (TNF) spontaneous secretion from peripheral blood mononuclear cells, but rather GAD65-induced TNF-α increased. Spontaneous interleukin-17a secretion increased after the administration of Etanercept, and GAD65-induced cytokines and chemokines were also enhanced following 1 month of Etanercept administration. CONCLUSIONS: Combination therapy with parallel treatment with GAD-alum, Etanercept and vitamin D in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes was feasible and tolerable but had no beneficial effects on the autoimmune process or beta cell function.

Safety and Immunological Evaluation of Interleukin-21 Plus Anti-α4ß7 mAb Combination Therapy in Rhesus Macaques.

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) infections compromise gut immunological barriers, inducing high levels of inflammation and a severe depletion of intestinal CD4+ T cells. Expression of α4ß7 integrin promotes homing of activated T cells to intestinal sites where they become preferentially infected; blockade of α4ß7 with an anti-α4ß7 monoclonal antibody (mAb) prior to infection has been reported to reduce gut SIV viremia in rhesus macaques (RMs). Interleukin-21 (IL-21) administration in antiretroviral therapy-treated, SIV-infected RMs reduces gut inflammation and improves gut integrity. We therefore hypothesized that the combination of IL-21 and anti-α4ß7 mAb therapies could synergize to reduce inflammation and HIV persistence. We co-administered two intravenous doses of rhesus anti-α4ß7 mAb (50 mg/kg) combined with seven weekly subcutaneous infusions of IL-21-IgFc (100 µg/kg) in four healthy, SIV-uninfected RMs to evaluate the safety and immunological profiles of this intervention in blood and gut. Co-administration of IL-21 and anti-α4ß7 mAb showed no toxicity at the given dosages as assessed by multiple hematological and chemical parameters and did not alter the bioavailability of the therapeutics or result in the generation of antibodies against the anti-α4ß7 mAb or IL-21-IgFc. Upon treatment, the frequency of CD4 memory T cells expressing ß7 increased in blood and decreased in gut, consistent with an inhibition of activated CD4 T-cell homing to the gut. Furthermore, the frequency of T cells expressing proliferation and immune activation markers decreased in blood and, more profoundly, in gut. The combined IL-21 plus anti-α4ß7 mAb therapy is well-tolerated in SIV-uninfected RMs and reduces the gut homing of α4ß7+ CD4 T cells as well as the levels of gut immune activation.

Reformulating Small Molecules for Cardiovascular Disease Immune Intervention: Low-Dose Combined Vitamin D/Dexamethasone Promotes IL-10 Production and Atheroprotection in Dyslipidemic Mice.

The targeting of proinflammatory pathways has a prophylactic and therapeutic potential on atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases (CVD). An alternative/complementary strategy is the promotion of endogenous atheroprotective mechanisms that are impaired during atherosclerosis progression, such as the activity of tolerogenic dendritic cells (tolDC) and regulatory T cells (Treg). There is a need to develop novel low cost, safe and effective tolDC/Treg-inducing formulations that are atheroprotective and that can be of easy translation into clinical settings. We found that apolipoprotein E-deficient (ApoE-/-) mice treated with a low-dose combined formulation of Vitamin D and Dexamethasone (VitD/Dexa), delivered repetitively and subcutaneously (sc) promoted interleukin-10 (IL-10) production by dendritic cells and other antigen presenting cells in the lymph nodes draining the site of injection and the spleens. Expectedly, the treatment also increased the numbers of IL-10-producing CD4+ T cells. Concomitantly, the frequency of IFNγ-producing CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in the spleen, and the IFNγ response of splenocytes to polyclonal stimulation ex vivo were lower after VitD/Dexa treatment, indicating a reduced proatherogenic Th1 response. Interestingly, VitD/Dexa-treated mice had smaller atherosclerotic lesions, with reduced lipid content and lower inflammatory infiltrate of macrophages and T cells in the aortic root. No hypolipidemic or antioxidant effect could be detected, suggesting that a dominantly immunomodulatory mechanism of atheroprotection was engaged under the low-dose sc VitD/Dexa conditions used. Finally, no evidence of clinical, biochemical or immune toxicity was observed in treated ApoE-/- mice and, most importantly, C57BL/6 mice latently infected with Leishmania parasites and treated with an identical VitD/Dexa dose/scheme showed no clinical or microbiological signs of disease reactivation, suggesting the absence of general immunosuppression. Altogether, these results indicate that a non-toxic, non-immunosuppressive, low-dose of VitD/Dexa, administered subcutaneously and repetitively, exerts atheroprotective effects in dyslipidemic mice, apparently due to the induction of an IL-10-producing network of lymphoid and myeloid immune cells. These well known, widely available, and inexpensive small molecules can be easily co-formulated into a simple and accessible agent with a potential use as a prophylactic or therapeutic immune intervention for CVD and other chronic inflammatory diseases.

Network-Based Selection of Candidate Markers and Assays to Assess the Impact of Oral Immune Interventions on Gut Functions.

To assess the safety and efficacy of oral immune interventions, it is important and required by regulation to assess the impact of those interventions not only on the immune system, but also on other organs such as the gut as the porte d'entrée. Despite clear indications that the immune system interacts with several physiological functions of the gut, it is still unknown which pathways and molecules are crucial to assessing the impact of nutritional immune interventions on gut functioning. Here we used a network-based systems biology approach to clarify the molecular relationships between immune system and gut functioning and to identify crucial biomarkers to assess effects on gut functions upon nutritional immune interventions. First, the different gut functionalities were categorized based on literature and EFSA guidance documents. Moreover, an overview of the current assays and methods to measure gut function was generated. Secondly, gut-function related biological processes and adverse events were selected and subsequently linked to the physiological functions of the GI tract. Thirdly, database terms and annotations from the Gene ontology database and the Comparative Toxicogenomics Database (CTD) related to the previously selected gut-function related processes were selected. Next, database terms and annotations were used to identify the pathways and genes involved in those gut functionalities. In parallel, information from CTD was used to identify immune disease related genes. The resulting lists of both gut and immune function genes showed an overlap of 753 genes out of 1,296 gut-function related genes indicating the close gut-immune relationship. Using bioinformatics enrichment tools DAVID and Panther, the identified gut-immune markers were predicted to be involved in motility, barrier function, the digestion and absorption of vitamins and fat, regulation of the digestive system and gastric acid, and protection from injurious or allergenic material. Concluding, here we provide a promising systems biology approach to identify genes that help to clarify the relationships between immune system and gut functioning, with the aim to identify candidate biomarkers to monitor nutritional immune intervention assays for safety and efficacy in the general population. This knowledge helps to optimize future study designs to predict effects of nutritional immune intervention on gut functionalities.

The Impact of Immune Interventions: A Systems Biology Strategy for Predicting Adverse and Beneficial Immune Effects.

Despite scientific advances it remains difficult to predict the risk and benefit balance of immune interventions. Since a few years, network models have been built based on comprehensive datasets at multiple molecular/cellular levels (genes, gene products, metabolic intermediates, macromolecules, cells) to illuminate functional and structural relationships. Here we used a systems biology approach to identify key immune pathways involved in immune health endpoints and rank crucial candidate biomarkers to predict adverse and beneficial effects of nutritional immune interventions. First, a literature search was performed to select the molecular and cellular dynamics involved in hypersensitivity, autoimmunity and resistance to infection and cancer. Thereafter, molecular interaction between molecules and immune health endpoints was defined by connecting their relations by using database information. MeSH terms related to the immune health endpoints were selected resulting in the following selection: hypersensitivity (D006967: 184 genes), autoimmunity (D001327: 564 genes), infection (parasitic, bacterial, fungal and viral: 357 genes), and cancer (D009369: 3173 genes). In addition, a sequence of key processes was determined using Gene Ontology which drives the development of immune health disturbances resulting in the following selection: hypersensitivity (164 processes), autoimmunity (203 processes), infection (187 processes), and cancer (309 processes). Finally, an evaluation of the genes for each of the immune health endpoints was performed, which indicated that many genes played a role in multiple immune health endpoints, but also unique genes were observed for each immune health endpoint. This approach helps to build a screening/prediction tool which indicates the interaction of chemicals or food substances with immune health endpoint-related genes and suggests candidate biomarkers to evaluate risks and benefits. Several anti-cancer drugs and omega 3 fatty acids were evaluated as in silico test cases. To conclude, here we provide a systems biology approach to identify genes/molecules and their interaction with immune related disorders. Our examples illustrate that the prediction with our systems biology approach is promising and can be used to find both negatively and positively correlated interactions. This enables identification of candidate biomarkers to monitor safety and efficacy of therapeutic immune interventions.

Hope vs hype: where are we in type 1 diabetes?

Much progress has been made in type 1 diabetes research. Biological replacement of islet function has been achieved with pancreas transplantation and with islet transplantation. In the future, human embryonic stem cells and/or induced pluripotent stem cells may offer a potentially unlimited source of cells for islet replacement. Another potential strategy is to induce robust beta cell replication so that regeneration of islets can be achieved. Immune interventions are being studied with the hope of arresting the type 1 diabetes disease process to either prevent the disease or help preserve beta cell function. Mechanical replacement of islet cell function involves the use of glucose sensor-controlled insulin infusion systems. As all of these avenues are pursued, headlines often overstate the case, thus hyping any given advance, which provides enormous hope for patients and families seeking a cure for type 1 diabetes. Often, however, it is an animal study or a pilot trial that is being described. The reality is that translation to successful trials in human beings may not be readily achievable. This article discusses both the hype and the hopes in type 1 diabetes research.

GAD65: a prospective vaccine for treating Type 1 diabetes?

INTRODUCTION: In spite of modern techniques, the burden for patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) will not disappear and T1D remains a life-threatening disease causing severe complications and increased mortality. We have to learn how to preserve residual insulin secretion or even increase beta cell regeneration. This would give a milder disease, simpler treatment and perhaps even cure. Thus, there are good reasons to try therapies that may preserve beta cell function. Areas covered: In this review the author reviews the literature and registered ongoing trials using GAD-alum put in relation to the high number of published different immune interventions. Expert opinion: GAD-alum treatment is safe, tolerable and easy for the patients and healthcare. It seems probable that treatment with GAD65-alum 20 µg sc can preserve residual beta cell function in T1D, but efficacy needs to be improved. This may be achieved by the use of combination therapies and new approaches for administration.

Effect of simultaneous vaccination with H1N1 and GAD-alum on GAD65-induced immune response.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: A European Phase III trial of GAD formulated with aluminium hydroxide (GAD-alum) failed to reach its primary endpoint (preservation of stimulated C-peptide secretion from baseline to 15 months in type 1 diabetes patients), but subgroup analysis showed a clinical effect when participants from Nordic countries were excluded, raising concern as to whether the mass vaccination of the Swedish and Finnish populations with the Pandemrix influenza vaccine could have influenced the study outcomes. In the current study, we aimed to assess whether Pandemrix vaccination affects the specific immune responses induced by GAD-alum and the C-peptide response. METHODS: In this secondary analysis, we analysed data acquired from the Swedish participants in the Phase III GAD-alum trial who received subcutaneous GAD-alum vaccination (two doses, n = 43; four doses, n = 46) or placebo (n = 48). GAD autoantibodies (GADA) and H1N1 autoantibodies, GAD65-induced cytokine secretion and change in fasting and stimulated C-peptide levels from baseline to 15 months were analysed with respect to the relative time between H1N1 vaccination and the first injection of GAD-alum. RESULTS: GADA levels at 15 months were associated with the relative time between GAD-alum and Pandemrix administration in participants who received two doses of the GAD-alum vaccine (p = 0.015, r = 0.4). Both in participants treated with two doses and four doses of GAD-alum, GADA levels were higher when the relative time between vaccines was ≥210 days (p < 0.05). In the group that received two doses of GAD-alum, levels of several GAD65-induced cytokines were higher in participants who received the H1N1 vaccination and the first GAD-alum injection at least 150 days apart, and the change in fasting and stimulated C-peptide at 15 months was associated with the relative time between vaccines. Neither of these effects were observed in individuals who received four doses of GAD-alum. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: In individuals who received two doses of GAD-alum, receiving the Pandemrix vaccine closer to the first GAD-alum injection, i.e. <150 days, seemed to affect both GAD65-induced immune response and C-peptide preservation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00723411.

GAD-specific T cells are induced by GAD-alum treatment in Type-1 diabetes patients.

Administration of Glutamic Acid Decarboxylase (GAD)65 formulated in aluminium hydroxide preserved insulin secretion in a phase II trial in recent onset Type 1 Diabetes. A subsequent European phase III trial was closed at 15months after failing to reach primary endpoint, but the majority of the Swedish patients completed the 21months follow-up. We studied the frequencies and phenotype of T cells, suppressive capacity of Tregs, GAD65-induced proliferation, and frequencies of T cells with a GAD65-specific TCR in Swedes participating in the trial. Stimulation with GAD65 induced activated T cells and also cells with a suppressive phenotype. Activated GAD65-specific effector T cells were detected by tetramer staining while the frequency of GAD65-specific Treg was not affected by the treatment. Additional doses of GAD-alum increased frequencies of CD25+CD127+, but had no effect on CD25hiCD127lo. Our findings indicate that GAD-alum treatment primarily induced activated T cells. GAD65-specific cells were mainly of activated phenotype.

Harnessing the potential of noninvasive in vivo preclinical imaging of the immune system: challenges and prospects.

Preclinical imaging has become a powerful method for investigation of in vivo processes such as pharmacokinetics of therapeutic substances and visualization of physiologic and pathophysiological mechanisms. These are important aspects to understand diseases and develop strategies to modify their progression with pharmacologic interventions. One promising intervention is the application of specifically tailored nanoscale particles that modulate the immune system to generate a tumor targeting immune response. In this complex interaction between immunomodulatory therapies, the immune system and malignant disease, imaging methods are expected to play a key role on the way to generate new therapeutic strategies. Here, we summarize examples which demonstrate the current potential of imaging methods and develop a perspective on the future value of preclinical imaging of the immune system.

Correlation Among Hypoglycemia, Glycemic Variability, and C-Peptide Preservation After Alefacept Therapy in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: Analysis of Data from the Immune Tolerance Network T1DAL Trial.

PURPOSE: In natural history studies, maintenance of higher levels of C-peptide secretion (a measure of endogenous insulin production) correlates with a lower incidence of major hypoglycemic events in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1D), but it is unclear whether this is also true for drug-induced C-peptide preservation. METHODS: We analyzed hypoglycemic events and glycemic control data from the T1DAL (Inducing Remission in New-Onset T1D with Alefacept) study, a trial of alefacept in new-onset T1D, which found significant C-peptide preservation at 1 and 2 years. We performed a post hoc analysis using mixed models of the association between the meal-stimulated 4-hour C-peptide AUC (4-hour AUC) and rates of major hypoglycemia, measures of glycemic control (glycosylated hemoglobin [HbA1c]; mean glucometer readings), and variability (glucometer SDs; highest and lowest readings), and an index of partial remission (insulin dose-adjusted HbA1c[ IDAA1c]). FINDINGS: Data from 49 participants (33 in the alefacept group and 16 in the placebo group) were analyzed at baseline and 12 and 24 months. We found that the 4-hour AUC at baseline and at 1 year was a significant predictor of the number of hypoglycemic events during the ensuing 12-month interval (p = 0.030). There was a strong association between the 4-hour AUC and glucometer SDs (P < 0.001), highest readings (p < 0.001), and lowest readings (p = 0.03), all measures of glycemic variability. There was a strong inverse correlation between the 4-hour AUC and 2 measures of glycemic control: HbA1c and mean glucometer readings (both p < 0.001). There was also a strong inverse correlation between the 4-hour AUC and IDAA1c values (p < 0.001), as well as a strong correlation between IDAA1c values and glucometer SDs (p < 0.001), suggesting that reduced glycemic variability is associated with a trend toward partial remission. None of these analyses found a significant difference between the alefacept and placebo groups. IMPLICATIONS: Measures of glycemic variability and control, including rates of hypoglycemia, are significantly correlated with preservation of C-peptide regardless of whether this is achieved by immune intervention with alefacept or natural variability in patients with new-onset T1D. Thus, preservation of endogenous insulin production by an immunomodulatory drug may confer clinical benefits similar to those seen in patients with higher C-peptide secretion due to slow disease progression.

[Immune modulation of shikonin in a rat allergic rhinitis model].

Objective:To study intervention effect of shikonin on immune function of dendritic cells using a rat allergic rhinitis model.Method: Forty rats were divided into three groups include OVA group(n=15),OVA+ shikonin group(n=15), and control group(n=10).The rat allergic rhinitis model was estabilshed after OVA sensitization and local challenge. 100 µg/ml shikonin was spray inhalated after OVA challenge in OVA+ shikonin group. The expression of CD80,CD86,IL-10 and IL-12 was deteced by immunohistochemistry in three groups.Result: In OVA+ shikonin group, the CD80 value was 13.52± 3.53,CD86 value was 24.01±13.12;in OVA group, the CD80 value was 17.19± 4.42 and the CD86 value was 38.89±9.77.The IL-10 value was 6.69±1.12 and 3.61± 0.23 in OVA group and OVA+ shikonin group,respectively.The IL-12 value was 44.30± 9.70 and 28.80+8.20 in OVA group and OVA+ shikonin group,respectively.Conclusion:The shikonin has effect on immune modulation in rat model of allergic rhinitis.

[Insulin secretion in the early phase of type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) and new hopes for maintaining it through therapy]. / Insulinosekrecja we wczesnej fazie cukrzycy typu 1 i nowe nadzieje terapeutyczne na jej utrzymanie.

Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) is an autoimmune disease with a progressive loss of pancreatic beta cell functional mass and subsequent impairment of insulin secretion. At present, the most important factors that help sustain insulin secretion at the early stage of the disease and have the potential to reduce the risk or even prevent long-term diabetic complications include early diagnosis, early initiation of the insulin therapy, an appropriate education of patients and immunotherapeutic interventions. In this paper, the issue of insulin secretion at the early stage of T1DM and some of the most recent research on novel therapies supporting traditional treatments are discussed.